<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/sitedesign/oneworld/rss.xslt"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/article/archive/8377</link>
<language>en_GB_uk</language>
<title>OneWorld UK - UK/English/OneWorld UK/Get involved/Blogs/Carbon Countdown/carbon blogs/Getting Down to Detail/Fear of flying</title>
<description>
</description>
<item>
<title>A quiet, fuel-efficient way to fly?</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/75500</link>
<description>from Green Car Congress:

With a fuel economy - per passenger - equivalent to a hybrid car carrying two passengers, this quiet 'flying wing' may have a future.
Image: Four (tiny) views of the SAX-40 aircraft</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Offsets:a dangerous distraction </title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/75216</link>
<description>from Gristmill blog:

The U.K. is going offset-crazy, but how much is it helping the planet?
Image: Driving to our doom?</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Contradiction of Flying</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/75095</link>
<description>from Oil Change:

Either countries reduce aircraft travel or they will not be able to reduce their carbon emissions. There is no technical fix.
Image: Too many of these</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trains better than planes</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/73942</link>
<description>from ecostreet blog: 
We probably all know that but here's some real evidence.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>To offset or not: a question for our times</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/73710</link>
<description>from Treehugger blog:

A British travel company is now planting a tree for every flight booking it takes.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carbon offsets: the great debate</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/73655</link>
<description>from Climate Change Action blog: 
People running forestry offsets are 'well intentioned but, in my opinion, misguided'.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Suicide pact with aviation</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/71320</link>
<description>from marklynas.org blog:

&quot;The UK government is promoting aviation growth whilst at the same time pretending to deal seriously with climate change.&quot; But there is a way forward: a no-flying movement is beginning to take shape.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Myth of Cheap Flights</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/69572</link>
<description>From Grownupgreen:
MYTH: We can meet our international obligations on climate change and still have unrestrained growth in aviation and airports

FALSE! Aviation is the UKs fastest growing source of CO2 emissions and by 2010 the increase in emissions from aviation would wipe out the Governments Kyoto and domestic reductions programme. (House of Commons Environment Audit Committee)</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carbon Compensation</title>
<link>http://uk.oneworld.net/link/gotolink/addhit/69126</link>
<description>Tom Dyson's blog:
I've attempted to compensate for the carbon emissions resulting from our recent flights to Greece and Denmark by funding a proportionate amount to sustainable energy and reforestation projects. I used an Oxford-based organisation called Climate Care, recommended by Nick, who neutralised the carbon output of his stag weekend to Barcelona, G8-style.</description>
</item>
</channel></rss>